Anybody talking about safety issues. Or we have another around of avoid the topic with all soughts of talks besides the actual topic of 6g being dangerous for the public's health.

Luthfor, 15 Sep 2022After 6G come they will announce 7G is coming which is 100times faster than 6G.....than will a... more & the range becomes shorter & shorter & shorter & so on...... Cities, villages, rural areas, mountains, etc. will be covers with thousands of cell towers...... People will eventually feel & get affected by the radiation as the Frequency goes higher & higher.

LG dumped their mobile division just as it was becoming interesting and they dumped their solar panel division just as there's an energy shortage, but building the next generation of the least used parts of 5G is full-go? Investors need to have a word with them. THz transmissions would be enormously useful in satellite-to-satellite communications. Down on Earth, it's terrible range and instability. Google and Apple have been holding back phone tech so they can't even use TB/sec bandwidth. A typical 512 GB phone could buffer about 2 seconds of data.

HovadoLesni, 15 Sep 2022Climate is changing and average temperature is increasing for decades. You can make the same a... more Omg,bro chill out.it was ment to me a joke about those who believe in this kind conspiracies . Why so serious man🤷

After 6G come they will announce 7G is coming which is 100times faster than 6G.....than will again anounce 8G....this will continue.....but we will never get actually better Mobile Internet speed

Berserker, 14 Sep 2022Coming up next: Since the 5g infrastructure went global.the climate change and the global war... more Climate is changing and average temperature is increasing for decades. You can make the same argument that since PlayStation 5 was released the same increase happened. Or are you gona say the same when steam deck 2 is released?

Samath N8 808 owner, 14 Sep 2022Appreciable, but it seems the more we go wireless, the more we're going wired. Let me exp... more It was really a bad move to defunk 2G/2.5G/3G when it can stil be used for basic wider range communications like sms, calling & some low data required stuff more importantly during emergency situations. 2G also requires very low power to operate on their spec'd coverage compared to 4G & above that not only need many towers for better coverage also uses many times more power which is gonna be costly.

Anonymous, 15 Sep 2022mmWave already has terrible penetration in the GHz range. Isn't THz going to be even wor... more Gotta be and they will have to build hundreds of towers in a city just to get good coverage.

I didn't know there were so many anti-5G people on a site like GSMArena. I wonder if they named it 4G V2 would have gone over better. LTE A Pro+? LTE A Pro Max? 4.9G? Wi-Fi Celluar?

mmWave already has terrible penetration in the GHz range. Isn't THz going to be even worse? Sounds like another tech for stadiums.

And when connected to 100 users, it runs in USB 1.0 speed.

Anonymous, 14 Sep 2022I don't see why we need this. The 5G towers already kill plants and animals where they... more You guys are awesome. In these gloomy days, who can make us laugh?

Coming up next: Since the 5g infrastructure went global.the climate change and the global warming increased Just some ideas for the conspiracy folks to keep them awake at night.

Come back LGMobile. We miss you.

Rosso, 14 Sep 2022This is false, science literally does not back it up, the electromagnetic waves that 5G towers... more I don't disagree with your post, but microwaves don't produce visible light but can harm a person. UV C can damage skin and is visible. It's the type of wave and what it's power is that can cause harm. My argument would simply state that these frequencies were already in we're already in use, and had to be bought by cellular companies. They already existed and some in use and we didn't have problems then. So it's not a big issue now. I will say open minded and if we do find they can cause harm let's revert to a new technology but as for now I'm not seeing anything that says we should be concerned.

Appreciable, but it seems the more we go wireless, the more we're going wired. Let me explain. 2G had a huge range. 4G had limited range. With higher frequencies and data rates, 6G will be even lower, to the point where we might have a tower every 100-200 households. And underneath those towers, we anyways have wired connections. So, are we eventually changing GSM into Wifi? Why not aim for smart, instead of just speed and brute horsepower?

you have to suffer, 14 Sep 2022 waiting for 2030 to get 5G in indonesia😂 when phones are sell with 5g support. its useless. mmWave 5G is affected by humidity and vegetation. So probably suitable only for urban areas of Indonesia. Regular 5G not much difference from LTE.

Chris, 14 Sep 2022Its hella dangerous ,if u think its safe go look up info how its frying ppls brains ,anything ... more Tell me you don't know science without actually telling me you dont know science

Anonymous, 14 Sep 2022I don't see why we need this. The 5G towers already kill plants and animals where they... more This is false, science literally does not back it up, the electromagnetic waves that 5G towers produce are long relative to ones for example, your own lightbulb produces, or any form of visible light, put simply, if 5G was dangerous, lightbulbs would be too, as would visible light, but they aren't. Put simply, yes, you are conspiracy theorist.

Home News Reviews Compare Coverage Glossary FAQ RSS feed Youtube Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2000-2022 GSMArena.com Mobile version Android app Tools Contact us Merch store Privacy Terms of use Change Ad Consent Do not sell my data